Articles by "Azam Khan"
Showing posts with label Azam Khan. Show all posts



Badaun, Apr 4: Senior Samajwadi Party leader and former minister Mohammad Azam Khan on Wednesday got a major relief when a local court set aside a sedition case against the leader.
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Badaun, Amarjeet Singh rejected the case of sedition against Mr Khan filed by one Bajrang Dal leader Ujjawal Gupta.
However, the petitioner has said he would go to the Allahabad High Court.
The petitioner alleged that on December 21,2010, Mr Khan had given a controversial statement on Jammu and Kashmir during a demonstration in the district. Gupta had filed a police complaint on December 22 and on January 3,2011 had filed a case in the CJM court under section 156(3) of the CrPC.
The then CJM Pawan Pratap Singh on January 18, 2011 had ordered filing of the case against Mr Khan and asked the police to investigate. But the police submitted an FIR in the case but again the court rejected it and directed the police to re-investigate the case taking in consideration the video recording of the statement of the leader.
But thereafter too, the police gave clean chit to the SP leader saying that the petitioner could not provide the video recording of the statement. UNI


New Delhi, Jul 31 :  Attorney General KK Venugopal, top law officer representing the Union government, today requested the Supreme Court to take necessary action against the Samajwadj Party (SP) leader Azam Khan for allegedly obstructing justice in connection with the Bulandshahr gangrape case. Khan, a former Minister in the Uttar Pradesh government, had reportedly remarked that the Bulandshahr gangrape case was a political conspiracy. A bench, headed by Justice Dipak Misra, and also comprising Justice AM Khanwilkar, heard arguments in the case involving Khan. The apex court had in December last year accepted the unconditional apology tendered by Khan for his statement. The Supreme Court decided to hear the matter on the issue of whether such kind of remarks made by politicians are correct. UNI